News Post
California counties oppose Phillips 66’s oil-by-rail project to local refinery
By Kristen Hays
Reuters
County planners want to squash Phillips 66's proposal to transport heavy crude by rail to one of its California refineries, saying it is too risky to public health and the
environment.
The staff of San Luis Obispo County's planning commission this week recommended that commissioners reject the project because of "significant and unavoidable" impacts from toxic
emissions and contaminated water to fires and explosions if trains derail or leak.
That recommendation came a week before a public hearing Feb. 4-5 on whether to grant permits allowing the company to build the 41,000-bpd project first proposed in 2013.
It is one of several rail projects on the US West Coast that have undergone lengthy
environmental reviews while facing heated opposition in light of fiery crude train crashes since mid-2013.
"We understand that there are concerns about the
project and we look forward to addressing questions" in the review, Phillips spokesman Dennis Nuss said on Tuesday.
The Benicia Planning Commission will hold a similar hearing Feb. 8, with more if necessary, on Valero Energy's proposed 70,000-bpd rail
project - also delayed pending reviews - at its
refinery there.
Unlike other proposals that aim to receive both light inland US and Canadian heavy crude via rail, the Phillips project would handle just heavy crude at its Santa Maria refinery in Arroyo Grande, California.
That plant is built to process heavy oil produced in California. Once initially processed, it moves via pipeline more than 200 miles north to the company's
refinery in Rodeo near San Francisco to turn into fuels. The two plants' combined capacity is 120,200 bpd.
Phillips proposed the rail
project because California oil output is shrinking and the company wanted another source of crude. The company had hoped to start up in 2014, but
environmental reviews pushed final consideration of permits to 2015 and then this year.
Crude by rail has declined since mid-2014, as US oil prices slid more than 70% and discounts of domestic crude to global crudes that once topped $20 narrowed to less than $1.
Cheaper domestic crude helps cover extra transportation costs of rail, but a narrow spread entices coastal refiners to take imports instead.
Last month, Phillips started up its own joint-venture rail loading terminal in North Dakota, shipping crude loaded on railcars from trucks to its New Jersey
refinery, Nuss said.
(Reporting By Kristen Hays; Editing by David Gregorio)
For subscriptions or a demo:
Sam Hassaniyeh
Subscription Executive
Phone: +44 203 4092242
For questions or to give feedback:
Thad Pittman
Senior Researcher
Phone: +1 (713) 525-4605
Download our brochure today!
Project News